10 Feb
Percentage of men and women on different Wikipedias
Few days ago there was an interesting article on NYTimes about the small percentage of women on Wikipedia.
Today on the gendergap mailing list at wikipedia there is a very interesting ongoing discussion. Some preliminary statistics from the discussion are:
| Wikipedia in specific language | Number of users who specified gender in preferences | Percentage of users who specified gender in preferences | How many men | How many women | Percentage of women |
| English http://en.wikipedia.org | 13959842 | 2.01% | 233312 | 46973 | 16.76% |
| German http://de.wikipedia.org | 1167708 | 3.47% | 35726 | 4800 | 11.84% |
| French http://fr.wikipedia.org | 998668 | 2.16% | 18556 | 3054 | 14.13% |
| Serbian http://sr.wikipedia.org | 78180 | 2.66% | 1666 | 414 | 19.90% |
| Russian http://ru.wikipedia.org | 620393 | 16.80% | 80491 | 23750 | 22.78% |
| Polish http://pl.wikipedia.org | 414511 | 3.64% | 12106 | 2999 | 19.85% |
| Dutch http://nl.wikipedia.org | 368815 | 2.92% | 8977 | 1781 | 16.56% |
| Commons http://commons.wikimedia.org | 1464442 | 2.26% | 27980 | 5070 | 15.34% |
Interesting to note how on Russian Wikipedia, users tend to express their gender much more (16.80%!). Do you have ideas if (1) this is a cultural issue specific of Russians, (2) it depends on the practices of the specific Wikipedia in Russian or (3) it depends on the user interface, for example it might be that when you register you are redirect to an HTML page in which you can specify also your gender?
Also interesting is the fact that in this Wikipedia the percentage of women is the highest (22.78%). Probably the reason is that in a place in which gender is more represented, it is more normal for women to represent it as well. While where gender it is not represent, it is in general foolish for women to explicitly say “Hey, I’m female!” in order not to attract (additional) unwanted messages. Or put in other terms, OMG Girlz Don’t Exist on teh Intarweb!!!!1.
Img by nojhan, under Creative Commons
If you enjoyed reading this, subscribe to my RSS Feed
(you can always unsubscribe later)
Posted by Amir E. Aharoni on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
In the Russian Wikipedia the namespace for user page can be both ???????? in masculine and ????????? in feminine. The implementation is partial, but it’s more than nothing.
Posted by Amir E. Aharoni on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
No Unicode? :(
Posted by paolo on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
Sorry for the lack of unicode, Amir! ;(
So if I understand correctly, if a user has set male in preferences, his user page will be at something such as User_male:Example and if she has set female, her user page will be at something such as User_female:Example. Of course “User_male” should be replaced with the string in Russian (which is not visible here for my luck of unicode, sorry!).
This surely is an incentive for expressing your gender! Interesting!
Do you know if this happens in other Wikipedias?
I post the question on the mailing list as well.
Thanks for your comment?
Posted by paolo on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
Another question:
In Russian Wikipedia, if gender is not set, how User: is rendered? With the male equivalent or there is a neutral form?
Posted by Lvova on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
In Russian Wikipedia, if gender is not set, how User: is rendered? With the male equivalent or there is a neutral form?
With the male equivalent, yes
In the Russian Wikipedia the namespace for user page…
It isn’t a real namespace; we have a template http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A8%D0%B0%D0%B1%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%BD:%D0%A3%D1%87%D0%B0%D1%81%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B8%D1%86%D0%B0
This template has 1 interwiki, as you see
Posted by HenkvD on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
I suppose the high percentage of Russian users who have declared their gender is partly caused by the large growth in the comunity. New users set their preferences, and gender is part of it. Most older users (especially english) are not even active anymore, or only update the part they want (for editing, watchlists or so.
Would it be possible to have this table updated for only active users? That might give a much higer percentage of users who declared their gender.
Posted by Kaldari on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
I tried changing my gender pref on ru.wikipedia.org from unspecified to male and female and didn’t notice any difference. It seems to render as ????????:Kaldari under any of the 3 options.
Posted by paolo on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
Thanks Lvova, very interesting! I’ll try to experiment with similar templates on the Italian Wikipedia.
HenkvD, people who have an account on toolserver.org can generate these statistics, at the moment I don’t have one.
Kaldari, I’m sorry I don’t know what to tell you since I don’t read Russian ;(
Posted by Amir E. Aharoni on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
The actual title of the page remains the same for males and females. As Lvova says, to actually make it appear feminine, one needs to use a template. You can, however, use this “namespace” in a URL – it is a synonym for the masculine namespace name.
That’s what i meant when i wrote “partial, but more than nothing”.
Posted by paolo on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
thanks amir, I need to play a bit with the templates to totally grok it, I think. But thanks!
Posted by paolo on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
An email by Daniel ~ Leinad at mailing list
Re: [Gendergap] Gender identification in Russian Wikipedia
In my opinion it doesn’t clearly explain higher gender identification on ru.wiki
Similar topic was a few days on Wikitech-l and I wrote:
“Polish, Czech, Russian Wikipedias have alias in feminine form (source:
http://noc.wikimedia.org/conf/highlight.php?file=InitialiseSettings.php)
- it means that also males can use female alias, for example
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedystka:Leinad (female alias) =>
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedysta:Leinad (regular namespace in
masculine form).”
Moreover, users on Polish Wikipedia by visiting [[Special:Watchlist]]
see a message asking them to set gender in Preferences, because it
allows to customize the interface (using {{GENDER:}}).
Make a note that currently gender support for interface is only partial, there are still pending or undeployed bugs (some are resolved just a few days ago, so I hope to see them in near time :-).
Maybe Russian Wikipedia had special campaign promoting to set gender in Preferences? :D
Posted by paolo on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Emijrp/Gender_gap/Wikimedia_comparison
Project? Male? Female? Unknown? Total? Female/Male (%)? Defined (%)?
ca.wikipedia.org 455 95 6689 7239 17.3% 7.6%
hu.wikipedia.org 1164 233 8603 10000 16.7% 14%
uk.wikipedia.org 1177 203 4527 5907 14.7% 23.4%
ro.wikipedia.org 573 98 6454 7125 14.6% 9.4%
fi.wikipedia.org 658 103 9239 10000 13.5% 7.6%
vi.wikipedia.org 577 89 4468 5134 13.4% 13%
cs.wikipedia.org 1158 156 8532 9846 11.9% 13.3%
sv.wikipedia.org 799 104 9097 10000 11.5% 9%
no.wikipedia.org 650 83 9267 10000 11.3% 7.3%
id.wikipedia.org 661 76 4090 4827 10.3% 15.3%
da.wikipedia.org 574 64 6696 7334 10% 8.7%
ar.wikipedia.org 1415 137 8232 9784 8.8% 15.9%
pl.wikipedia.org 2646 245 7109 10000 8.5% 28.9%
ru.wikipedia.org 3430 316 6254 10000 8.4% 37.5%
ko.wikipedia.org 972 86 8814 9872 8.1% 10.7%
pt.wikipedia.org 1668 120 8212 10000 6.7% 17.9%
fr.wikipedia.org 1855 130 8015 10000 6.5% 19.9%
tr.wikipedia.org 1328 87 8585 10000 6.1% 14.2%
nl.wikipedia.org 1026 63 8910 9999 5.8% 10.9%
en.wikipedia.org 2503 152 7345 10000 5.7% 26.6%
it.wikipedia.org 1574 95 8331 10000 5.7% 16.7%
ja.wikipedia.org 972 59 8965 9996 5.7% 10.3%
zh.wikipedia.org 1654 99 8246 9999 5.6% 17.5%
de.wikipedia.org 1989 112 7899 10000 5.3% 21%
es.wikipedia.org 1927 107 7966 10000 5.3% 20.3%
See also:
* meta:List of Wikipedias
[edit] Wikiversity
Project? Male? Female? Unknown? Total? Female/Male (%)? Defined (%)?
en.wikiversity.org 167 69 3331 3567 29.2% 6.6%
fr.wikiversity.org 56 7 553 616 11.1% 10.2%
ru.wikiversity.org 51 16 205 272 23.9% 24.6%
de.wikiversity.org 61 26 946 1033 29.9% 8.4%
See also:
* meta:List of Wikiversities
[edit] Wikibooks
Project? Male? Female? Unknown? Total? Female/Male (%)? Defined (%)?
en.wikibooks.org 206 30 9061 9297 12.7% 2.5%
de.wikibooks.org 109 3 1991 2103 2.7% 5.3%
See also:
* meta:List of Wikibooks
Posted by mulled wine on 10.02.11 at 2:27 pm
whoah this weblog is wonderful i like reading your posts.
Stay up the good work! You know, a lot of persons
are searching round for this info, you can help them greatly.